OCIE Issues Risk Alert Concerning Cross Trading Compliance Issues

OCIE Issues Risk Alert Concerning Cross Trading Compliance Issues

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

On September 4, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) issued a Risk Alert relating to rules governing principal transactions and agency cross transactions.

This Risk Alert does not appear necessarily to give any new guidance per se. In many regards, it is a reiteration of Section 206(3) and Rule 206(3)-2 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). Additionally, it cites how OCIE has specifically observed advisers violating these rules.

OCIE is encouraging investment advisers to read this Risk Alert, then review their own policies and procedures, as well as the implementation of those policies and procedures, to make sure they are compliant with the Advisers Act.

Section 206(3) and Rule 206(3)-2 Refresher

As in often the case with Risk Alerts and other SEC guidance, it is always a good practice to go back to what the actual regulation states and what is required. Although this may seem like a redundant part of the Risk Alert, OCIE clearly believes that advisers are not adequately understanding exactly what constitutes a principal or agency cross transaction.

Principal trades occur when an adviser, directly or indirectly, knowingly (a) sells a security to a client; or (b) purchases a security from a client. When engaging in a principal transaction, the adviser must obtain client consent prior to the completion or settlement of such transaction. Note, that consent can be received after the execution of a trade but must be obtained before settlement. When consent is not received, the adviser is in violation of the Rule, regardless of whether or not the transaction was objectively fair or in a client’s best interest.

Agency cross transactions are when an adviser, or one of its affiliates, act as a broker on a transaction in between a client and another party. A violation would occur when this is not properly disclosed to the client before the completion of the transaction. That said, Rule 206(3)-2 does allow for an adviser to engage in agency cross transactions without having to obtain consent on a transaction-by-transaction basis. The following four items would need to be obtained in writing: (1) client executed written consent prospectively for agency cross transactions after receive a full written disclosure on the conflicts; (2) informs the client before or at the completion of the transaction that such transaction is occurring; (3) the adviser provides at least annually a disclosure statement with a summary of all cross transactions; and (4) the client may revoke any consent at any time.

What OCIE is Seeing in Examinations

One of the more obvious areas that adviser can take some action is in simply identifying principal and cross transactions. OCIE is finding that advisers are not finding them and, as a result, are not receiving or disclosing the proper information. Although it is a good practice to back test for any principal or cross transactions, little can be done after completion or settlement because the Rule would already be broken at that point. Essentially, any disclosure or consent after the fact is still a violation.

Specifically, advisers whose client are pooled investment vehicles may have some specific items to consider. OCIE pointed out that an adviser (including its control persons) who owns a significant ownership stake[1] in a vehicle is engaging in principal transactions with other clients when they sold securities from these accounts to other clients. These advisers failed to identify these transactions as principal transactions. Even when they were identified, advisers failed to obtain the required consent.

Cross transactions had similar issues. In some instances, advisers informed clients that they would not engage in agency cross transactions but in fact did so. Some of the advisers who stated that they were able to rely on Rule 206(3)-2 were unable to prove they complied with the written consent, confirmation or disclosure requirements. Thus, they were, in fact, not able to rely on the Rule.

What To Do With the Risk Alert

The most important thing to do is to review your policies to what the SEC has identified as issues, and what you are actually doing. If it is never the case that you engage in these transactions, all is well. That being said, it may a good practice to review past transactions in order to ensure that no principal transactions or agency cross transaction have occurred. If there are some findings, a policy review would be necessary.

If it is the case the you may from time to time engage in principal transactions, policies and procedures should be reviewed in order to ensure that consent is received, and disclosures are given prior to settlement. A compliance infrastructure that is able to identify any principal transactions is crucial. Likewise, disclosure of conflicts is a very key and vital component of this Risk Alert.

Finally, if engaging in cross transactions, you should review the authority given by clients for such transactions. It is vital that all of this information is kept in writing and able to be offered to the SEC upon request. The four items listed above are what is required and what the SEC expects to see. Again, informed consent is crucial, and disclosure should be exhaustive.

Ultimately, it comes down to having policies and procedures reasonably designed for your business, having adequate disclosures and written consent where required.

The full text of the SEC’s Risk Alert can be found in PDF format here.

[1] “Significant Ownership” generally means ownership in excess of 25%. The Staff previously rule in a no action letter that ownership of 25% or less is not applicable (Gardner Russo & Gardner, June 7, 2006)

Related Posts

JP Gonzalez

JP Gonzalez is a Partner at Greyline and heads the company’s technology and sales initiatives globally. He is also a member of gVue’s steering committee. Prior to joining Greyline, JP spent six years designing and evangelizing Compliance Regulatory Technology for broker-dealers, investment advisors and fund managers, where he assisted clients with all aspects of complying with FINRA, SEC and state rules and regulations related to a firm’s code of ethics. His technology background includes five years as a software developer and program manager at Microsoft, with his last two years at Microsoft as the UX/UI usability and accessibility program manager for Internet Explorer. He has a B.S. in Computer Science from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.

Nick Thomas

Nick Thomas is a Partner at Greyline and oversees the London office, which provides compliance support to U.K.-based hedge funds, private equity firms and other alternative asset managers. Prior to joining Greyline, Nick spent 13 years at the Financial Conduct Authority, the U.K. regulator, followed by three years at a well-known international compliance consultancy. During this time, he gained a broad and deep understanding of the U.K. regulatory environment applicable to alternative asset managers – both from the perspective of the regulator and the firms being regulated. His time at the FCA included working as a supervisor on the alternative investments team, with responsibility for supervising some of the largest and most prominent hedge funds in the U.K., and undertaking firm examinations across a broader population of alternative asset managers. Prior to this, he worked extensively on AIFMD implementation from the FCA’s perspective, as well as assessing applications from investment firms seeking to obtain FCA authorization. Nick obtained a BSc in Mathematics from Imperial College London. In addition, he holds the Investment Management Certificate (IMC), the Fundamentals of Alternative Investments Certificate and the Financial Planning Certificate (FPC). He also speaks Japanese.

Tim Goodwin

Tim Goodwin is a Partner at Greyline and the head of the Fort Worth office. Prior to joining Greyline, Tim spent two years providing ongoing compliance and consulting services to alternative asset managers, including private equity funds, venture capital funds, real estate funds and hedge funds. He worked at TPG Capital for seven years in compliance and internal audit positions. As a director in the risk management and internal audit department, Tim was responsible for documenting and testing TPG’s allocation of fees and expenses, as well as preparing the firm for possible public listing, by leading TPG’s efforts in Sarbanes Oxley testing and compliance. Before joining the internal audit team, he spent five years running TPG’s compliance testing efforts across all of TPG’s businesses, including the private equity funds, credit platform, hedge funds, a 40 Act fund and a registered broker dealer. Prior to joining TPG Capital and moving to Texas, Tim spent more than six years with UBS Wealth Management (New York and New Jersey) in various compliance roles, touching on investment company, investment adviser and broker dealer compliance. He was most recently the chief compliance officer to UBS’s unit investment trusts and a compliance director for advisory products, including the separately managed account, financial advisor discretionary and mutual fund wrap programs. He assisted UBS in its first ever required annual reviews conducted pursuant to the compliance program rule, helped design and implement compliance policies and procedures for UBS’s advisory programs, and routinely assisted in updating required disclosure documents, including the Form ADV.

Jennifer Dickinson

Jennifer Dickinson is a Partner at Greyline and heads the firm’s Chicago office, as well as its CFTC/NFA practice. Her clients include private fund managers (hedge, private equity, venture capital and real estate), traditional RIAs, CPOs, CTAs and Swap Dealers. Jennifer advises on a range of compliance matters, including code of ethics/insider trading issues, risk management, compliance training, conflicts of interest and regulatory examinations. Prior to joining Greyline, Jennifer was the managing director of Sansome Strategies, a boutique compliance consulting firm specializing in alternative asset managers. Her other consulting experience includes serving as chief compliance officer for three prominent, SEC-registered investment advisers. Jennifer has also worked at noted law firms in the financial services space, including Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP. Jennifer began her career as the legal and compliance administrator at Standard Pacific Capital LLC, a SEC-registered, multi-strategy hedge fund manager based in San Francisco. Jennifer has an undergraduate degree from DePauw University and a law degree from Golden Gate University School of Law, where she was the editor–in–chief of the Law Review.

Sean Wilke

Partner & Head of Strategic Growth
Sean Wilke is a Partner, and the Head of Strategic Growth at Greyline and its affiliate GCM Advisory, which specialize in compliance consulting and outsourced finance, accounting and operations. He has extensive experience advising various types of investment managers, including hedge funds, private equity/credit funds, wealth managers, registered investment companies, institutional allocators and family offices, on a range of regulatory, compliance, operational and management matters. Before joining Greyline, Sean was a director within the governance, risk, investigations and disputes group at Duff & Phelps, where he focused on compliance and regulatory consulting for the alternative investment space. Prior to that, he was the general counsel and chief compliance officer of Bramshill Investments, a $4 billion, multi-strategy investment manager, where he oversaw all legal and compliance affairs. Sean also spent four years as a corporate and securities attorney at a law firm, as well as three years as a compliance associate at Bear Stearns & Co., where he performed surveillance for the investment and merchant banking groups. Sean has a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and a J.D. from New York Law School.

Kathy Malone

Partner & Head of Consulting
Kathy Malone is a Partner at Greyline and co-head of the firm’s New York office. Before joining Greyline, she was an examiner with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations in the Boston and New York offices, where she participated in numerous investment adviser and broker-dealer examinations. Prior to her time with the SEC, she was an examiner with FINRA, completing many examinations of broker-dealers and enforcement referrals. Most recently, Kathy worked for a consulting firm where she assisted broker-dealers, investment advisers and investment companies with the registration process, examination support and ongoing compliance needs. She has a B.S. in Finance from Villanova University and a Juris Doctor from Seton Hall Law.

Talia Brandt

Partner & Chief Operating Officer
Talia Brandt is a Partner at Greyline, and a member of gVue’s steering committee. Her team from Vista Compliance, LLC joined Greyline in May 2017. Talia founded Vista Compliance — a compliance consulting firm servicing broker-dealers, registered investment advisors and private fund managers — in April 2008. In her role with Greyline, Talia works closely with firms to ensure compliance with FINRA, state and SEC regulations. She has developed and implemented compliance and financial policies and procedures to ensure solid internal controls are in place for varying financial services firms. In addition to her compliance consulting work, Talia has served internally to firms as chief compliance officer and holds FINRA Series 7, 24, 66 and 79 registrations. Prior to forming Vista Compliance, Talia worked at Goldman Sachs in the investment management division in Salt Lake City. She then moved to the Bay area, where she went to work with smaller startup, boutique financial services firms.

Matt Okolita

Managing Partner

Matt Okolita is Managing Partner of Greyline, and a member of gVue’s steering committee. He has extensive SEC, FINRA and CFTC experience, having worked for and with premier hedge funds, private equity and venture capital firms, CLO and other debt managers, business development companies and mutual fund managers in both legal and compliance roles. Matt’s background includes undertaking a variety of legal and compliance functions, serving as counsel and chief compliance officer for startup managers, as well as international asset managers managing more than $30 billion. Matt has a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and Economics from Bucknell University and a Juris Doctor from Suffolk University Law School, with distinction in Business Law and Financial Services.